Then there was the media Web site -- we're looking at you, New York Post -- that railed against the "peephole pervert" exploiting the "sideline siren," then posted that story alongside a slide show of images captured from the video, complete with black bars covering Andrews' naughty bits."Peephole Outrage," railed the Post's front-page headline, referring, I think, to the other people showing Andrews naked.
There's nothing extraordinary about what she's doing in the clips -- brushing her hair, ironing pants, checking her backside in the mirror -- but the fact that it is Andrews, lust object of a high percentage of young American men, has made the video into the Pamela Anderson tape of the moment.Plus, Andrews already has a lot of exactly the kind of attention the video is bringing. Her outfits have achieved legendary status -- Google "Erin Andrews ESPY Awards dress" -- and sports blogs grab any excuse to post a new picture. Rare is the Web site that has not run a photo gallery of the woman nicknamed "Erin Pageviews."
Other bloggers, though, felt remorse. On Deadspin, a leading sports blog that has been part of the Andrews celebratory chorus, blogger Will Leitch fretted that all the unfettered lust led directly to the grotesque privacy violation: "If I ran into her on the street today," he wrote, "I'm not sure I could look her in the eye. I'm not sure anybody could."


